
Sending or posting a link? Cut it down to size for free with urlCut.com! No ads!

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Main Board ]

This just seems so wrong. sm

Posted by lissa on February 09, 2010 at 11:37:12:

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash

Lisa the repubs weren't voting against a stimulus for the economy, they voting against the INSANE porkulus it turned out to be. How could anyone have voted that that thing? nm 11:43:52 2/09/2010 (8)
- 60% of earmarks for Dems and 40% for Repubs. Barely a hair's difference. sm lissa 12:03:50 2/09/2010 (6)
  - I see both points of view on this. Since the bill passed, the taxpayers sm rwc 12:10:13 2/09/2010 (5)
    - No, if the constituents voted you in, they share in the consequences of your vote. If you vote no, no should also mean no thanks to any benefits the bill might have. lissa 12:16:22 2/09/2010 (4)
      - If you vote no, and vote is ignored (bill passes), no one is bound by it. sm . 11:57:30 2/10/2010 (0)
      - Then your taxpayers should be able to opt out of paying for it. sm rwc 12:28:52 2/09/2010 (2)
        
        It's remarkably deceptive to voters. Majority rules and laws are made sm lissa 12:34:02 2/09/2010 (1)
        
        and don't get me started about states' rights and how I think that system should work. nm lissa 12:45:21 2/09/2010 (0)
- for the clueless out there, there is a huge difference between a stimulus and a porkulus. A porkulus is a stimulus with a TON of pork attached. 11:47:47 2/09/2010 (0)

Post a Followup