NotSoPolituvus


Sending or posting a link? Cut it down to size for free with urlCut.com! No ads!

NotSoPolituvus

We have all heard that politics and religion are not discussed in polite society. Well, this board was created for those of us who would like a forum to discuss those subjects that others aren’t so passionate about. Other than legalities associated with message boards such as this, the rules here are simple – no bullying other posters (bullying can take many forms) and no person other than public figures (meaning specifically other MTs) should be discussed here. Racism will not be tolerated. Please report legal violations or bullying (include a link to the specific post) on the Restuvus Monitors Board, and we will delete the post/s if warranted. Remember you can only post about 40 words of copyrighted material and then follow that up with a link to the source. It is not required that any poster place within their post any statement that their post is simply their opinion. That is understood.

Can you discuss issues without bullying your opponent?
Enjoy your stay!

Just for Fun: A Metaphysical Safe Harbor (password protected), Book Board, Delicate Issues, Entertainment Board, Just Funderin', Links Lost 'n Found, LMBO, MT Freebies, The StewPot

Life/Family: Amazing Angels (password protected), Dr. Doolittle's Menagerie, Fussy Family, Gnosis-InterFaith , Maternity Corner, Moving On, MT Plate (diet & weight loss), School At Home, School Bell, Spot for RugRats, Yours, Mine & Ours

People & Projects: Backwoods Mama, Catwoman's Blog, JJ's Garden, Kristin's Family Video, MT Precious Presents, MTShoebox Project 2004, Queenie Weenie's Songs, Talon's Blog, Restuvus OR

MT Sites & Business/Jobs: Restuvus, Restuvus Too (backup board for Restuvus), AAMT Online Forum, MT Desk Chat, MT Daily, MT Desk, MT Exchange, MT Jobs, MT Stars, MT Thoughtless, MT Wanted, Productivity Talk, Rennie's Boards, Restuvus, Sci-Med, Scribera

Words/Reference: Word Board, Acronym Finder, Google, Links, Links & More Links, Macros, Mojo's MT References, MS Word for MTs, MT Resourcez, OneLook, Prescribing Reference, RXList, WordPerfect for MT, Word Board Backup

Roadways: Amazon.com, Beware The Troll, Boobs, Injuries and Dr. Pepper, BookCloseOuts.com, Calendar, Earth Calendar, eBay, Flame Wars, Internet Trolls, Karaoke Stories, My Space, Old Farmer's Almanac, Overstock.com, Pete's Pond, PostSecret, Space.com, Weather Underground, Woot.com, YouTube, Neptune Cafe

Restuvus Chat | E-mail Administration | Monitors Board

[ Post Message ]

I found Bozell you were referring to. - Good article - AD - you might want to read (sm) 11:05:25 2/08/2012 (0)
“I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by - America’s most powerful interests,” -- Obama 10:56:47 2/08/2012 (1)
- He is just so obvious, and yet his supporters defend this. - Granny - (msg) 10:59:02 2/08/2012 (0)
Looks like there might be a Chrysler sleaze connection after all. - Probably paid for by Obama. (link) 07:13:00 2/08/2012 (7)
- The Anointed One must be re-elected at all costs. Clint got used. - nm 10:37:56 2/08/2012 (2)
  - Does that mean he's a tool? LOL - nm 10:42:15 2/08/2012 (1)
    - At 81 years of age, he's obviously not the *sharpest* tool in the box. - This is definitely a case of elder abuse. nm 10:58:14 2/08/2012 (0)
- Ya just gotta love Rove and his cronies. - They really know how to fling the BS. nm 08:06:28 2/08/2012 (3)
  - The only BS being flung is the "Halftime in America BS" from the LIBERAL DIMS - in Hollywood who want Obama re-elected for another term. NM 10:42:40 2/08/2012 (0)
  - I can't stand Rove but I know the difference between fact and BS - nm 08:11:04 2/08/2012 (0)
  - We all know just how accurate the hollyweird reporter rag is. - Mmmmmm -Hmmmmm. nm 08:08:17 2/08/2012 (0)
Thanks again Obama. Next year Medicare patients (sm) - msg 15:50:31 2/07/2012 (8)
- Goes back to the old axiom: Inexpensive, easily accessable, quality: Pick two. - nm 11:01:35 2/08/2012 (0)
- Link please. I'd like to read your information. - nm 05:26:30 2/08/2012 (1)
  - No you wouldn't. Not if you're almost Medicare age. - It's too depressing. 09:34:16 2/08/2012 (0)
- This has been rampant with private insurance companies for years. (NM) - Now you complain because the government wants to save money also? Can't win! 18:30:49 2/07/2012 (2)
  - Also: You blame Obama. Do you think a Republican would do better for you...(nm) - ...as far as Medicare goes? None of them are advocating expanding that program. 18:31:50 2/07/2012 (1)
    - Republicans wouldn't add to the Medicaid rolls like Bozo is doing. - Get a job if the economy is on the upswing. Right? 08:02:20 2/08/2012 (0)
- It's already getting ridiculous for most of us. DH had a lap chole. He was literally OUT the door - 45 min after he opened his eyes from anesthesia. NM 18:26:26 2/07/2012 (1)
  - That's a lot different than an elderly person being in the hospital for - COPD with congestive heart failure. Pain pill? 06:53:38 2/08/2012 (0)
Patient is actively working for equal opportunity employment. - What does that mean?? 12:21:12 2/07/2012 (1)
- Probably means patient works for EEOC, - Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. nm 12:23:01 2/07/2012 (0)
I will admit that I am fast approaching older than dirt status and sm - lissa 10:52:15 2/07/2012 (5)
- I'm with Phyllis. Listened to about a minute. Was that actual WORDS?? - Granny 15:23:17 2/07/2012 (0)
- Here's a video of the same group. - SM 14:12:58 2/07/2012 (1)
  - That's okay, thanks anyway. - I'll pass. 07:50:35 2/08/2012 (0)
- I couldn't watch more than a few seconds. All the (sm) - Phyllis 12:09:57 2/07/2012 (0)
- More proof that I was right in my decision to never watch Letterman. - nm 12:02:04 2/07/2012 (0)
Clint Eastwood: "I am certainly not affiliated with Mr. Obama." - sm 20:01:55 2/06/2012 (0)
I actually came here today to see if anyone has any sm - Tammy 15:08:12 2/06/2012 (5)
- I think they're worried they may have to do a peackeeping mission like they sm - Tammy 12:00:22 2/07/2012 (0)
- I would wager that there has NEVER been a good year in the peaceful world realm. - It's sadly just the way it is. And it probably always will be. 06:51:28 2/07/2012 (0)
- Escalated violence in the country & towards our ambassador PLUS the fact - Syria supports terrorists and is friendly to Iran, Hezbollah, & Hamas. 20:56:53 2/06/2012 (0)
- Staffing an embassy in a location confers legitimacy on that location. (nm) - Syria's current leadership is not worthy of a U.S. diplomatic presence. Hence, we leave. 18:33:13 2/06/2012 (0)
- Since they already have Americans there that they won't allow to leave, (sm) - Phyllis 18:03:55 2/06/2012 (0)
"Democratic voters must be looking to the Republican field with envy." - SM 14:47:31 2/06/2012 (1)
- Couldn't access the article, but envy, LOLOL! nm - Tammy 15:10:16 2/06/2012 (0)
Whatcha think about the Chrysler/Clint Eastwood/halftime in America ad? - sm 23:11:16 2/05/2012 (49)
- I guess Fiat, the Italian automotive company who owns majority of Chrysler - wanted to fool Americans into thinking it's an American company SM 17:08:44 2/06/2012 (29)
  - Chrysler may be owned by Fiat, but no Chrysler has EVER been - manufactured outside the US. nm 11:58:29 2/07/2012 (12)
    - You'd better do more research. Homework skills are sorely lacking. - Chrysler's PT Cruiser is made in Mexico. Jeep transmissions SM 12:21:20 2/07/2012 (2)
      - They don't make the PT Cruiser anymore. - Just sayin 12:29:42 2/07/2012 (1)
        
        Please address "no Chrysler has EVER been been . - manufactured outside the US." sm 14:53:00 2/07/2012 (0)
    - 4-got 2 add: I don't give a damn who owns the company, if the product - is made in the USA by US workers, I'll buy it in a heartbeat. nm 12:00:54 2/07/2012 (8)
      - Then you should consider Honda, Toyota, Kia or Hyundai. - They're all made here by US workers. nm 12:23:58 2/07/2012 (7)
        
        Yes, but owed by Japan. - Dixiedew 14:10:58 2/07/2012 (6)
        
        Yet who owns Chrysler? You don't seem to care if it's owned - by Italy/Canada, etc. SM 14:46:09 2/07/2012 (5)
        
        the stockholders, who live all over the world. Same with any large corporation. - billybob 22:09:33 2/07/2012 (1)
        
        Oh stop, Billybob. Fiat is blocking a Chrysler IPO. They OWN 58.5% of it. - An Italian company with EU investors. sm 10:36:47 2/08/2012 (0)
        
        You're the one who keeps yapping about Chrysler and outside - sm - Dixiedew 20:25:34 2/07/2012 (1)
        
        Once again, define "A LOT OF PEOPLE" in Detroit? How many? - You do realize that commercial was shot in New Orleans and LA don't you? nm 10:26:31 2/08/2012 (0)
        
        Canada doesn't even want to do business with us anymore - - 'The US can't be trusted." Gee, why is that? 16:00:05 2/07/2012 (0)
  - Do you really think we're stupid? You can deflect if you feel like it, sm - Dixiedew 21:18:58 2/06/2012 (15)
    - "a lot of people in DETROIT" work for them? Um...maybe 1 or 2 thou. - Not very many if you ask me, which you didn't and SM 00:05:47 2/07/2012 (7)
      - Not a comparison to Mexico, but here's some facts. sm - Dixiedew 04:59:20 2/07/2012 (1)
        
        shoo? Why don't you shoo yourself? If you don't want to discuss - with another person, just don't post, but to tell Sm 10:43:41 2/07/2012 (0)
      - Okay, you win. Maybe 1 or 2? I don't know how it applies to - sm - Dixiedew 04:48:06 2/07/2012 (4)
        
        Re: Okay, you win. Maybe 1 or 2? No dear, I said 1 or 2 thou, i.e. thousand. - Reading 101 10:41:20 2/07/2012 (3)
        
        Then spell out what you mean. Thou could be interpreted as - though. Dixiedew 12:40:15 2/07/2012 (2)
        
        though is tho, not thou - nm 14:46:53 2/07/2012 (1)
        
        She knows that. She tried a save, it didn't work. - nm 16:12:45 2/07/2012 (0)
    - Deflect? WTH are you talking about? It's relevant to the conversation. - nm 23:46:02 2/06/2012 (6)
      - Because the only one I really see trying to fool the American people is people - like you...the bait and switchers. Dixiedew 05:01:35 2/07/2012 (5)
        
        How am *I* trying to fool the American people? What am I baiting and switching? - Obviously you don't realize that Chrysler is foreign-owned SM 10:46:54 2/07/2012 (4)
        
        Like I initially said...I'VE OWNED CHRYSLER vehicles - sm - Dixiedew 12:37:40 2/07/2012 (3)
        
        "Pulling this country together." I'm too astounded to even address this post. - DD, open your eyes - please. 16:15:12 2/07/2012 (1)
        
        You might enjoy reading this, but I doubt it. sm - nm 20:37:14 2/07/2012 (0)
        
        Don't hold up Obama as the epitome of "pulling America together" - when you cannot even address the fact that he propped up SM 14:55:55 2/07/2012 (0)
- Outstanding. Moving. True. - nm 11:05:05 2/06/2012 (0)
- I heard that from the other room. When it was over, I said who paid for that? - Granny 07:35:12 2/06/2012 (14)
  - I'm pretty sure Chrysler paid for it, and my interpretation is - buy from an American company. It's Chrysler's logos. nm 11:05:15 2/06/2012 (0)
  - WOW!! I just looked at FoxNation and one of their headlines is (sm) - Granny again 10:16:04 2/06/2012 (12)
    - Makes me proud that for the better part of my adult life I have - owned Chrysler vehicles. I still do...Jeep Grand Cherokee that I love. Dixiedew 11:09:01 2/06/2012 (0)
    - And one more (Chrysler denies political msg) - AD 10:44:15 2/06/2012 (6)
      - Well, they can deny it all they want, but it sounded campaign-ish to me. - G 16:03:17 2/06/2012 (5)
        
        I guess we always hear what we listen for. - Dixiedew 05:00:23 2/07/2012 (4)
        
        You certainly do. Nice Hollywood tricks, making you think - the commercial was filmed in Detroit. They lied. nm 14:57:14 2/07/2012 (3)
        
        Show me where I said the commercial was filmed in Detroit. Go ahead, - show me. I never once said it was filmed in Detroit. Dixiedew 20:39:01 2/07/2012 (1)
        
        Show me where I said you said that. - Go ahead. Show me. nm 10:39:29 2/08/2012 (0)
        
        LOL - nm 17:25:19 2/07/2012 (0)
    - Here's an article. sm - AD 10:42:24 2/06/2012 (3)
      - Funny...my 12yo DS actually asked why Christian Bale was in this ad. I sm - Tammy 16:00:50 2/06/2012 (1)
        
        Yes, I googled it after I posted - he seems to be a moderate. - Granny 16:02:21 2/06/2012 (0)
      - Funny...my 12yo DS actually asked why Christian Bale was in this ad. I sm - Tammy 15:53:05 2/06/2012 (0)
- I think the NFL isn't too proud of progress in America. - nm 06:09:22 2/06/2012 (2)
  - What progress? Hasn't been any in at least the last 12 years. - nm 16:04:23 2/06/2012 (1)
    - Then blame the NFL, who gets most of their uniforms and equipment - made outside America. They should and could do better. nm 05:03:16 2/07/2012 (0)
First Iowa, now Nevada. Look no farther than the GOP for voter fraud at its finest. - lissa 17:02:27 2/05/2012 (19)
- This country is so corrupt, both sides. We're all being - lied to. I can't prove it, but all signs point to it and i just feel it. nm 22:36:09 2/06/2012 (0)
- "Look no farther than the GOP for voter fraud at its finest." That's a crockful of pffft - The DIMS own voter fraud. nm 23:12:31 2/05/2012 (3)
  - Election fraud is rampant all over and will continue to be sm - lissa 11:04:25 2/06/2012 (2)
    - Why vote when all we have to choose from is Larry, Curly and Moe? - They all STINK. nm 11:36:18 2/06/2012 (1)
      - Your candidate(s) may stink, but mine is fantastic. - nm 19:38:05 2/07/2012 (0)
- Is this what you are referring to? Wasn't this Ron Paul's people - trying to register voters late? I haven't really read this article, but saw on news. 17:12:45 2/05/2012 (11)
  - That was only the beginning. There are still no final results out of Nevada. - lissa 17:19:26 2/05/2012 (10)
    - It does take time to count them. Romney hasn't been declared the winner. - dp 21:14:39 2/05/2012 (0)
    - More info. sm - lissa 17:33:53 2/05/2012 (8)
      - Considering the Obama caucus shenanigans in Texas - this looks like preschool. SM 23:14:12 2/05/2012 (0)
      - Why do you see a conspiracy in everything? They probably didn't have sm - rwc 22:40:32 2/05/2012 (6)
        
        here's one reason sm - lissa 22:49:55 2/05/2012 (5)
        
        Maybe they want this to be accurate and are counting more than once or SM - nm 10:05:27 2/06/2012 (4)
        
        Or maybe they should not take them to a back room and count them in secret. - lissa 10:26:34 2/06/2012 (3)
        
        Exactly how would you have them counted to guarantee no voter fraud? - nm 14:32:46 2/06/2012 (0)
        
        Wasn't there an election where the ballots were sent out of state for counting? - nm 11:29:56 2/06/2012 (1)
        
        I believe that was Iowa, as reported by Politico, but I am not sure if that actually happened. - lissa 11:48:48 2/06/2012 (0)
- Do you mean Indiana? - nm 17:08:00 2/05/2012 (0)
- Hopefully they are gearing up for the Obama machine. - By hook or by crook. J/K (?) 17:04:53 2/05/2012 (0)
A viable alternative for those who don't want to - donate to Susan Komen Foundation anymore. link 12:23:15 2/05/2012 (1)
- Thank you - nm 13:25:21 2/05/2012 (0)
CNN calls Romney "Governor Mormon." CNN is not real news anymore. - That's disgusting. 11:33:39 2/05/2012 (29)
- Hannity calls Obama "the anointed one," and that drives me bonkers. sm - Tammy 13:34:42 2/06/2012 (12)
  - Consider the source. (and if you ever listen to Rush, he calls all the Democrats names). nm - AD 15:35:53 2/06/2012 (1)
    - I wouldn't listen to Rush even if I got paid to do it. But I believe you! nm - Tammy 15:48:47 2/06/2012 (0)
  - Well...there's a reason Hannity calls him that: - sm 14:01:02 2/06/2012 (9)
    - That's true. What "lame" attempt they made to discuss (sm) - Granny 16:05:51 2/06/2012 (1)
      - Thank you, Granny. I have read here from time to time, so I kinda sm - Tammy 20:21:48 2/06/2012 (0)
    - Hey, go easy on me. This is my first post here. Just pointing out sm - Tammy 15:02:49 2/06/2012 (6)
      - Re: "Hey, go easy on me." What did I say that bothered you? - I don't understand why you made that comment to me. nm 17:11:17 2/06/2012 (3)
        
        Nothing "bothered" me. Just can see you agree with Hannity and have sm - Tammy 19:33:33 2/06/2012 (2)
        
        I don't agree nor disagree with Hannity. He has his reasons. - sm 01:09:05 2/07/2012 (1)
        
        Criticizing and name-calling are two separate things. He is free to analyze the Prez's sm - Tammy 12:03:40 2/07/2012 (0)
      - Should have added to my post above, I'm not crazy about Hannity either (sm) - G 16:07:37 2/06/2012 (1)
        
        Rush doesn't lie either. He gives his own opinions, like them or not. I like them usually. - nm 19:51:35 2/06/2012 (0)
- And let's not forget Brent Bozell who called the Pres of the USA a - "skinny ghetto crackhead." AD 11:40:36 2/05/2012 (9)
  - Actually he said that in a COMPARISON to what Matthews said about Gingrich. - Context, context, context. nm 10:59:28 2/07/2012 (0)
  - Is it all 3 descriptions you object to? BTW, never heard of BB. - nm 16:22:24 2/05/2012 (0)
  - I do not know of this Brent Bozell you speak of - but maybe he was - going by that picture - you know, after Biden said he was clean. 11:51:39 2/05/2012 (4)
    - See Link - sm 18:56:34 2/05/2012 (2)
      - I've never seen him on Fox. - nm 17:48:04 2/06/2012 (1)
        
        I guess I just watch more Fox. Here you go. Here's just one instance. sm - AD 19:51:42 2/06/2012 (0)
    - Pictures - nm 11:58:10 2/05/2012 (0)
  - Brent Bozell = Fox News contributor - AD 11:40:57 2/05/2012 (1)
    - I never heard of him. - Fox watcher 14:06:19 2/05/2012 (0)
- Let's watch and see for ourselves. sm - AD 11:36:44 2/05/2012 (5)
  - Sure - a big mistake. - nm 11:37:35 2/05/2012 (4)
    - When the Fox News affiliate said that Pres. Obama was dead instead of OsamaBL, - was that intentional too? nm AD 11:46:42 2/05/2012 (3)
      - Of course it wasn't. Their names are easy to mix up. - I do it all the time when speaking of terrorists. 11:52:48 2/05/2012 (2)
        
        You wouldn't know a real terrorist if one walked up to you and said "Boo!" - nm 14:43:15 2/05/2012 (1)
        
        You're probably right about that. I think my neighbor is one. - Paranoia will destroy ya (sing-song voice) 15:41:30 2/05/2012 (0)
And people eat up this garbage. sm - AD 11:28:15 2/05/2012 (22)
- He probably means Republicans. Obama doesn't do it, plus - he throws flowers on graves on Veterans Day. 11:36:06 2/05/2012 (0)
- And more...sm - AD 11:34:50 2/05/2012 (20)
  - We were taught to put our right hand over our heart. (sm) - Phyllis 13:14:59 2/05/2012 (19)
    - We were only taught to do that for the pledge of allegiance, not the national anthem. - nm 13:33:59 2/05/2012 (18)
      - See Message - nm 10:18:19 2/06/2012 (13)
        
        Like I said below (posted last night) it was written into the US Flag Code - but not until 1942, and didn't exist until then. SM 11:47:30 2/06/2012 (12)
        
        It isn't mandatory. It's courtesy. No govt official sm - AD 13:12:07 2/06/2012 (11)
        
        Since this isn't Russia, I hope not. - nm 14:34:42 2/06/2012 (0)
        
        Students will be ostracized at school if they object. - I know that for a fact. nm 13:50:40 2/06/2012 (9)
        
        If a student legitimately feels he/she cannot sm - AD 15:40:02 2/06/2012 (8)
        
        You would be wrong. They notice all right, and call them names. - nm 17:12:51 2/06/2012 (7)
        
        That's why you have to be strong to stand for your convictions. - nm 19:53:48 2/07/2012 (0)
        
        There is no proof I am wrong in my assertion: sm - AD 17:31:45 2/06/2012 (5)
        
        Agreed, surprisingly, happily and excitedly. - nm 23:55:12 2/06/2012 (0)
        
        Nice romantic thinking there. - But your assertions are false. nm 19:04:04 2/06/2012 (3)
        
        When I'm thinking "romantic," it has nothing to do with a flag. nm - AD 21:48:16 2/06/2012 (2)
        
        you do realize words have multiple definitions, don't you? - sm 23:50:11 2/06/2012 (1)
        
        People here really have no sense of humor. nm - AD 07:26:21 2/07/2012 (0)
      - Exactly. (Unless of course you're a NASCAR fan. - nm 20:58:59 2/05/2012 (2)
        
        I see lots of people doing it at lots of public events, because - it apparently was written into the U.S. Flag code, but SM 23:15:44 2/05/2012 (1)
        
        Are you saying the flag code is crap? And if so, why? - nm 14:35:54 2/06/2012 (0)
      - Right. Me too. Hand over heart for pledge, stand at attention for anthem. nm - AD 13:35:10 2/05/2012 (0)
Mark Steyn rips Obama's "brother's keeper" - remarks - (sm) 12:36:16 2/04/2012 (0)
I would support Gingrey's decision to walk out on the prayer sm - AD 12:02:27 2/04/2012 (2)
- I don't know this person Gingrey that you speak of. - nm 09:32:50 2/05/2012 (1)
  - See Link - nm 10:13:06 2/05/2012 (0)
Voter fraud conviction. sm - lissa 11:26:51 2/04/2012 (0)
I think Bozo better stick to what he knows - - interpreting the Bible obviously isn't it. 15:26:18 2/03/2012 (40)
- He's got to campaign all he can right now. He's using - any chance he gets to appeal to different groups of voters. NM 15:40:53 2/04/2012 (1)
  - That's all he's been doing. He's run amok - $35,000 for the opportunity to - speak personally with him. I wouldn't pay a dollar. 16:21:57 2/04/2012 (0)
- Why? Because his interpretation doesn't match yours? - Bet mine won't match yours either. nm 10:44:06 2/04/2012 (3)
  - Are you running for president? - nm 10:14:20 2/05/2012 (2)
    - Are you? - nm 14:44:56 2/05/2012 (1)
      - I'm a different poster, dear. Sorry, should have said so. - nm 16:47:20 2/05/2012 (0)
- It was a prayer breakfast..the President did nothing wrong...the republican - who walked out on it? He is the fool. Called his office and told him as much. 16:15:45 2/03/2012 (17)
  - He probably doesn't even get those kinds of messages. Exercise in futility. - nm 10:16:27 2/05/2012 (0)
  - So you called his office. Did you post that to impress us? - nm 15:41:45 2/04/2012 (3)
    - Nasty. - nm 15:47:59 2/04/2012 (2)
      - yep. it was nasty to call the rep a fool. - but to be expected... nm 18:22:55 2/04/2012 (1)
        
        They called Joe Wilson names too. Who cares. - nm 06:47:54 2/05/2012 (0)
  - Didn't even know anyone walked out. Good for him. You lie! - OP 18:23:22 2/03/2012 (0)
  - Jackass. These GOP stunts are getting so old. We get it. You don't like Obama. - Tough shit. 16:31:21 2/03/2012 (10)
    - You mean the black theologian who pretends to be a Christian? - I just hate the hypocrisy and lies. 18:22:39 2/03/2012 (9)
      - Interesting that you mentioned his color here. - nm 22:00:11 2/03/2012 (4)
        
        I looked it up before I posted to make sure black was in the name of the "religion." It is. - So it's not all that interesting. - Color mentioner 07:41:53 2/04/2012 (0)
        
        Black liberation theology is the religion our current president - followed for 20 years, was married under and had his children SM 23:33:36 2/03/2012 (2)
        
        You're more than bored. - nm 06:55:41 2/04/2012 (1)
        
        And you've got no reply because the post above is right. - . 08:45:08 2/04/2012 (0)
      - Then you might want to begin cleaning up your own party. - Dixiedew 21:20:46 2/03/2012 (3)
        
        She's posting about a PUBLIC FIGURES. Why're you talking about HER? - She's not in charge of a "party." nm 14:58:17 2/04/2012 (0)
        
        You first. - nm 21:45:24 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        But I thought you were the true leader. - Dixiedew 06:56:27 2/04/2012 (0)
- Not everyone who says to me... - SM 15:57:39 2/03/2012 (15)
  - So, now you're playing God? What about Mr. Lizard and his - proclamation regarding Christianity? He sure follows scripture! Dixiedew 06:58:06 2/04/2012 (13)
    - Who is Mr. Lizard? - nm 13:11:01 2/04/2012 (0)
    - Are you saying that someone who quotes Bible scripture is playing God? Shame on you. - nm 08:44:20 2/04/2012 (11)
      - No, ma'am, not at all. It is no more of a shame for me to - sm - Dixiedew 10:59:58 2/04/2012 (10)
        
        Bible verses speak to all who believe. - dp 10:18:40 2/05/2012 (0)
        
        He's ONLY of the Christian faith at election time, hon. Haven't you noticed? - He's campaigning again. NM 15:40:04 2/04/2012 (1)
        
        That IS true. I think Easter went by and he never mentioned it. - He did have a Ramadan prayer day or something, though, didn't he? 15:42:41 2/05/2012 (0)
        
        But isn's that true about us no matter what we think? That only God and Obama - knows whether he is a Christian, even if we would like to believe he is. 11:15:41 2/04/2012 (6)
        
        Seems like I remember something about works, and I'm not - Dixiedew 15:54:22 2/04/2012 (5)
        
        Couldn't have said it better myself. - Thank you. 10:32:09 2/05/2012 (0)
        
        You think Obama is bringing this country out of chaos and is - "pretty much the leader of the pack????" Incredulous! nm 18:24:16 2/04/2012 (3)
        
        No more so than your daily rhetoric here. That's rather hysterical - within itself, knowing the meaning of hysteria and all. Dixiedew 14:47:10 2/05/2012 (1)
        
        "your daily rhetoric here???" What daily rhetoric of mine is here? - If you're accusing me of something, spit it out. nm 17:05:41 2/05/2012 (0)
        
        Hysterical! He has intentionally caused more chaos than probably - he had even hoped for! 06:02:35 2/05/2012 (0)
  - I hope he departs pretty quick. - nm 18:17:00 2/03/2012 (0)
What exactly does freedom mean? - sm 15:18:52 2/03/2012 (0)
What exactly does freedom mean? - sm 15:18:52 2/03/2012 (3)
- well, here's an illustration. - billybob 18:30:36 2/03/2012 (0)
- Sorry for the double post, and I meant to add this... - sm 15:19:53 2/03/2012 (1)
  - Freedom is the ability to make your own choices and - accept the responsibility of the consequences as your own. 15:39:29 2/03/2012 (0)
And here is an article regarding - that talks about the Bureau of SM 14:57:31 2/03/2012 (0)
Record 1.2 million people fall out - of labor force in one month SM 14:54:51 2/03/2012 (1)
- They are the ones who amble out to their mailboxes to get paid. - Obama is a "muck up." 12:43:54 2/04/2012 (0)
I've wondered often about this subject but sm - lissa 14:34:49 2/03/2012 (0)
UN wants world tax to help the poor. - nm 13:25:43 2/03/2012 (0)
I wonder how many votes President Obama will lose by telling - Israel to stand down and not attack Iran. 12:23:16 2/03/2012 (22)
- If Israel had any doubt about Obama's anti-Israel stance they better learn fast. sm - rwc 13:58:33 2/03/2012 (7)
  - Ain't that the truth. Next thing you know, Panetta will - be giving the exact date and trajectory coordinates to Iran. Disgusting. 14:25:21 2/03/2012 (6)
    - Making up the news now? - nm 14:29:03 2/03/2012 (5)
      - You can't tell the difference between opining and news? - nm 15:43:49 2/03/2012 (0)
      - Catwoman already posted this link, but the financial/cyber war on Iran has - already begun. see link 15:21:38 2/03/2012 (0)
      - Have trouble comprehending the written word? Where - does it say this happened? 15:03:53 2/03/2012 (2)
        
        Oh, come on!! This was so obvious. - nm 15:06:23 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        You're joking of course. - nm 19:48:40 2/03/2012 (0)
- Many. You want a war? You go. - Buhbye. nm 12:25:57 2/03/2012 (13)
  - Sorry, meant to say none, not many. - nm 12:31:38 2/03/2012 (12)
    - You are SOOO right. America has been at - We are exhausted, broke, our soldiers are a real mess. We don't have it in us for more. 20:26:59 2/03/2012 (1)
      - *should read "has been at war for over a decade." (nm) - Not sure what happened there... 20:27:36 2/03/2012 (0)
    - That Freud again. You were right the first time. He will lose Jews and Catholics - - many of them. 13:01:04 2/03/2012 (9)
      - No, he won't. No one wants war. - nm 13:35:43 2/03/2012 (8)
        
        Obama has the right to tell Israel to stand down? It isn't like - Obama is offering to help. He isn't. It wouldn't be our war. 13:59:42 2/03/2012 (2)
        
        Very naive. - nm 14:29:52 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        You don't know Obama very well then. - nm 15:44:58 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        and we're the only friend Israel has left. The real issue is - how much longer before they kick Netanyahu to the curb? nm 13:49:12 2/03/2012 (4)
        
        Soon, I hope. - nm 14:30:25 2/03/2012 (3)
        
        Yep, Israel is having their George Bush Moment. - War is business and it makes good money! nm 14:36:35 2/03/2012 (2)
        
        Nonsensical liberal talking point. - nm 15:52:55 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        It's easy to theorize while safely over here in the US. - . 15:19:02 2/03/2012 (0)
I watched this live yesterday, Andrea Mitchell - Confronted, respectfully, and intelligently, /sm 12:18:40 2/03/2012 (1)
- I saw that also. I think that she and the exec. speaking for SGK - were also friends? But still she calmly (and rightfully) spoke her mind. nm 10:34:19 2/05/2012 (0)
Sign the petition, link to Facebook. - Our troops deserve it!/sm 12:16:31 2/03/2012 (0)
Obama to Congress - don't muck up the recovery. - Is he talking about the improved 8.3 unemployment rate? 11:50:50 2/03/2012 (5)
- I loved it!! He was telling those mother muckers in Congress to STOP - OBSTRUCTING THE RECOVERY. 12:23:17 2/03/2012 (4)
  - And I bet you thought that was cute and unique. - nm 14:01:22 2/03/2012 (0)
  - Actually Congress is what started the recovery by - killing his second jobs bill. Job creation began after SM 13:00:52 2/03/2012 (1)
    - Yes, and they will have to fight him tooth and nail for hopefully only one more year. - He will continue to call THEM the obstructionists. What a $#%^* he is. 13:15:57 2/03/2012 (0)
  - You mean the liberals in the Senate who want to keep spending our money? - nm 12:35:05 2/03/2012 (0)
Komen will give money to PP. sm - AD 11:27:09 2/03/2012 (20)
- They caved. - nm 11:36:00 2/03/2012 (19)
  - Sad isn't it? - nm 11:55:28 2/03/2012 (18)
    - WHAAATTTT???? It is not sad. No politicizing women's health!! - nm 12:24:27 2/03/2012 (17)
      - Do you even know what you are talking about? PP doesn't do mammograms. - nm 15:40:11 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        No, they do screenings, manual exams, education about BSE, etc. sm - Why else would Komen have been funding them all this time if not for legitimate breast CA services? 04:10:13 2/04/2012 (0)
      - That is exactly what the pro-death people did, politicize - it. A private charity suddenly isn't free to makes its own SM 13:04:16 2/03/2012 (14)
        
        They are free to do whatever they want to do. That doesn't mean sm - AD 13:33:06 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        They will never get a dime of my money again. - nm 13:16:58 2/03/2012 (7)
        
        Komen or Planned Parenthood? - nm 13:19:10 2/03/2012 (6)
        
        Komen. - nm 13:23:16 2/03/2012 (5)
        
        I'm right there with you. An absolute travesty. - nm 14:03:18 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        I agree with you. - nm 14:02:43 2/03/2012 (3)
        
        Komen thought they saw backlash before. Wait. - nm 15:07:27 2/03/2012 (2)
        
        Really? Do you think you on the right can make them reverse their decision - again in 24 hours? Advice..don't hold your breath. 16:13:27 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        They didn't say they were donating money to PP now. Listen carefully. - Besides, I said backlash, not reverse the decision. (sm) 18:19:27 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        The funding was for mammograms for low income women. - nm 13:14:18 2/03/2012 (4)
        
        Right, except Planned Parenthood doesn't do mammograms, - they refer people elsewhere. They prefer baby killing equipment sm 13:40:30 2/03/2012 (3)
        
        Yes you're right, they refer them for FREE mammograms. - sm 22:02:43 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        They need $680 thousand a year, taken away from breast - cancer cure, for a secretary to do paperwork? That is reprehensible. 23:39:14 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        If babies are going to grow up to be intolerant dunces, then yes...(nm) - ...we need to continue to fund reproductive choice here. You see that, right? 20:29:21 2/03/2012 (0)
Brian Terry's mother to Eric know-nothing Holder : - You are a joke and a coward. 10:22:06 2/03/2012 (4)
- Is there anyone in this Admin who is not a joke? - Worst adminstration in our history. 11:59:26 2/03/2012 (3)
  - It is really an embarrassing time for the US right now. - nm 15:06:20 2/03/2012 (1)
    - Kind of like when Clinton was getting BJ's in the Oval Office. - That was embarrassing for the country 07:56:12 2/05/2012 (0)
  - Hardly. - nm 12:25:03 2/03/2012 (0)
I am so saddened by what I see. It's a damned if you do, - damned if you don't world. Dixiedew 09:21:45 2/03/2012 (2)
- Don't let the republican machine steal your joy. Ignore them. - They WILL go away. 12:27:07 2/03/2012 (1)
  - Not bloody likely. - nm 12:35:43 2/03/2012 (0)
AD, I was sad to see that you supported drug testing for welfare recipients so...sm - lissa 09:17:33 2/03/2012 (34)
- I love Aasif. sm - AD 09:58:45 2/03/2012 (3)
  - Aasif is my favorite. sm - lissa 10:05:29 2/03/2012 (2)
    - and I somewhat agree about the 2% but even doubled or tripled, not very significant. - lissa 10:10:27 2/03/2012 (1)
      - Agreed. And maybe in the end they'll discover it doesn't sm - AD 10:19:07 2/03/2012 (0)
- Why would you not support it? - Why did it make you sad? 09:32:37 2/03/2012 (29)
  - If they drug test everyone getting money from the govt - sm 13:18:36 2/03/2012 (0)
  - because it is unconstitutional and I think AD would know that. - lissa 09:37:56 2/03/2012 (27)
    - Of for the love of God.. Okay, if it's unconstitutional, the they can provide for themselves. - How constitutional is it that I pay for someone else to be a drug addict? 09:45:53 2/03/2012 (26)
      - Welfare isn't constitutional either but no need to keep shredding the Constitution. - lissa 09:48:36 2/03/2012 (25)
        
        so you'll shred it for welfare but not drug testing of those who receive it? - ::;THUD::: 17:17:43 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        You surprise me. It is okay only to shred some of it? - How much? When do we stop? 11:57:44 2/03/2012 (5)
        
        Surprised? I didn't say any of those things. I think we should stop right now - passing unconstitutional laws. lissa 12:18:25 2/03/2012 (2)
        
        Including welfare? - nm 12:24:39 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        yes - lissa 12:26:00 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        I think she is saying exactly the opposite. nm - AD 12:03:24 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        I must not have worded my post correctly or something. 2 people misunderstood. - lissa 17:51:06 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        Get rid of welfare and then you can get rid of drug testing. Fair? My employer - drug tested me when I was hired. Was that unconstitutional? 11:01:44 2/03/2012 (13)
        
        hard to tell if you are being argumentative or you really don't know the answer sm - lissa 11:16:21 2/03/2012 (12)
        
        I just do not understand why hard earned taxpayer money should be allowed to go to drug - addled people who are not productive members of society by their own choice. 11:33:55 2/03/2012 (11)
        
        That's just a myth that welfare recipients use drugs more than the general population. sm - lissa 11:47:48 2/03/2012 (10)
        
        The difference, some work for their money and others ambulate to the mail box for theirs. - There IS a difference. Most people who are productive are not drug addicted. 12:07:09 2/03/2012 (6)
        
        I will go out on a limb and say roughly 50% of all construction workers use some - kind of drug be it marijuana, meth, cocaine or pills sm 12:21:57 2/03/2012 (5)
        
        Why did you leave out alcohol? Because it is an accepted drug? - Hell, even MTs drink? you don't see the hypocrisy? 12:29:54 2/03/2012 (3)
        
        It is legal, yes. So are cigarettes. - nm 13:38:29 2/03/2012 (2)
        
        Doesn't mean they aren't drugs though does it? - nm 14:05:57 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        Doesn't matter what I think. They are legal in the US for 18/21 years old. - (assuming there is no probation or court document stating otherwise) sm 14:13:30 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        Amen to that. sm - lissa 12:25:29 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        They have no representation??!!! They have every liberal - representing them!! ARE YOU KIDDING ME?? 12:06:48 2/03/2012 (2)
        
        I was speaking more of lobbyists and such. - lissa 12:11:08 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        With every liberal shouting their cause, they obviously don't - need lobbyists. 11:21:09 2/05/2012 (0)
        
        Did you read about this lissa? - sm 09:50:39 2/03/2012 (3)
        
        That's ridiculous. It can't be unconstitutional for one and not the other. sm - AD 10:00:11 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        No kidding! I'm as conservative as they come and even that made me - fall out of my chair laughing. sm 10:21:14 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        OMG. Unbelievable. - Granny 09:57:42 2/03/2012 (0)
I see a glimmer of hope that our elected officials care what we think. sm - lissa 09:14:40 2/03/2012 (2)
- I agree, but from what I hear the bill doesn't really - go far enough, can't remember the details right now. nm 11:55:48 2/03/2012 (0)
- ...do NOT approve... - lissa 09:15:13 2/03/2012 (0)
About those new voter ID laws. - SM 08:29:11 2/03/2012 (1)
- I asked someone below for evidence of all this fraud that the sm - AD 08:46:59 2/03/2012 (0)
Snippets of Observations of the Secret Service who guarded Presidents. - Here's the Obamas - see link for the rest 16:50:09 2/02/2012 (8)
- This is easy to ascertain even without the Secret Service - input. Typical liberal politician. nm 23:29:13 2/02/2012 (0)
- Without attribution of any kind, why should we believe this is - anything other than fiction? - nm 20:50:05 2/02/2012 (0)
- Amusing, if you like fiction. - nm 18:11:35 2/02/2012 (3)
  - You are only assuming, but they all seem to pretty much follow - what people have seen for themselves. 18:59:43 2/02/2012 (2)
    - And you are assuming it is true because it hews to - your own personal opinion. Very convenient. - nm 20:50:43 2/02/2012 (1)
      - From what we have seen for ourselves and others have (sm) - Granny 05:58:40 2/03/2012 (0)
- And we should believe those who cannot uphold the ethics of abiding - by the requirements of their contracts/oaths? Obamas, or whoever...sm 17:54:48 2/02/2012 (1)
  - Does that include the presidents who slept around on their wives? - nm 14:08:03 2/03/2012 (0)
Yay! I won! ;) - nm AD 13:18:52 2/02/2012 (2)
- LOL. Makes me jump every time. - lissa 13:29:29 2/02/2012 (1)
  - and does it mean we won the debate because I don't hear it every time. - lissa 13:32:00 2/02/2012 (0)
And here we go...Sugar is as damaging and addictive as alcohol or tobacco and should be regulated - , claim US health experts. sm 09:28:23 2/02/2012 (9)
- Next stop - gov't regulation of Americans' sex lives. - No, wait! They've already tried to do that... see link 11:31:30 2/02/2012 (6)
  - State and local laws. Not the same. - nm 12:49:30 2/02/2012 (3)
    - instead of one tyrant 3000 miles away, 3000 tyrants one mile away. - billybob 14:33:15 2/02/2012 (2)
      - :) - Granny 17:54:21 2/02/2012 (0)
      - Exactly. Accountability. - nm 14:43:19 2/02/2012 (0)
  - Add Utah to the "no sex toys" rule. And the stores are obviously devoid of - any kind of revealing lingerie. Just drove through Utah last summer and noticed that while shopping. 11:50:35 2/02/2012 (1)
    - Not even close. You just didn't know where to shop. - nm 01:57:36 2/03/2012 (0)
- Yes, here we go is right. Pretty soon they will be watching us eat - - let's all get on the Aspartame, government issue train. Woo-hoo. 09:35:20 2/02/2012 (1)
  - It gets even better....(from a different article) - sm 09:36:38 2/02/2012 (0)
Translation of common euphemisms - sm 09:21:48 2/02/2012 (1)
- That's really good. Made me laugh many times. :-) - nm 10:31:44 2/02/2012 (0)
The House voted Wednesday to repeal part of Obamacare - It's being sent to the Senate SM 09:20:51 2/02/2012 (1)
- The Senate is a joke. - nm 12:47:40 2/03/2012 (0)
House Oversight Committee Hearing on Fast & Furious link - LIVE BROADCAST NOW! sm 09:17:37 2/02/2012 (1)
- Don't forget, no matter what happens, Eric Holder knew nothing. - Not a thing. 09:36:53 2/02/2012 (0)
And the sound bite gifts just keep comin... - Romney says he is not focused on the poor. No shit. 12:45:20 2/01/2012 (64)
- Liberal BS soundbite out of context. Nobody cares. - nm 23:27:16 2/01/2012 (2)
  - You're probably right...nobody cares about the poor. - nm 06:05:25 2/02/2012 (1)
    - That's bull. So many free opportunities for the poor if they want to pursue them. So much money - and time given to charities to help the poor. Because we ARE a caring people. 06:37:51 2/02/2012 (0)
- Yes, but try to get the context right. - A Dem - sm 15:43:27 2/01/2012 (47)
  - Like poor people aren't struggling? If not, what are they doing? - sm 06:06:51 2/02/2012 (45)
    - hit enter too soon - - sm 06:09:45 2/02/2012 (44)
      - I wasn't talking about the substance of what he says, just the context. - A Dem - sm 15:38:20 2/02/2012 (0)
      - Quit listening to the liberal talking heads. I'm a Republican. I don't hear ANYBODY talking - about taking away from those who struggle. That's just what your party tells you about us. 06:39:24 2/02/2012 (42)
        
        ^BS warning. Danger, beware of BS. It's ripe and deep, but - people like this one continue to believe it. nm 17:59:00 2/02/2012 (4)
        
        Yea right, you libs like to think you have the monopoly on caring about people. That's just one of - the left's tactics to demonize the right. We care too. 18:53:15 2/02/2012 (3)
        
        Actually we care more. Republicans are far more - charitable than democrats. Giving money to the needy under the SM 21:40:24 2/02/2012 (1)
        
        They are basically jaded on human nature, feeling that people will not give, so it must be taken. - How did the needy get help before the govt made it their duty? Charities... 05:56:17 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        "you libs" -- Listen to yourself! - nm 20:48:03 2/02/2012 (0)
        
        I'm rather sick of people like you telling people like me that - sm - nm 06:59:56 2/02/2012 (10)
        
        Another BOLD-faced lie. I don't listen to SP, GB, or RL. - nm 06:55:47 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        You can be sick of it all you want, it doesn't make it any - less true. Your name dropping is simply ridiculous and desperate sm 23:10:26 2/02/2012 (0)
        
        Some of parents and grandparents struggled and didn't hurt them or us. - This *ease* of living desire is crap. 19:07:49 2/02/2012 (1)
        
        Then let your own children pay their way through college, but their own - sm - nm 21:56:41 2/02/2012 (0)
        
        Here's the truth. Some people struggle because they make all the wrong choices... - SM 07:28:04 2/02/2012 (5)
        
        And there are many more of us struggling even though we made what were - the right choices for us then but imploded in our faces later. nm 17:56:50 2/02/2012 (3)
        
        That situation doesn't bother me at all as far as a helping hand. That can happen to ANY of us. - You know I'm talking about life-long stoop sitters who do nothing. 05:59:17 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        Maybe it wasn't the right choice after all hence the - implosion. NM 00:16:19 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        And self-righteous monday morning quarterbacking - makes you right? No. Just stupid. 01:59:33 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        I agree - and here's a prime example: Robert Mansfield - sm 07:47:00 2/02/2012 (0)
        
        Also, you confuse our ideal that people are happier if they can provide for themselves, as a goal. - Your party wants to keep them in a place where they need help, i.e. Dem votes. 06:40:35 2/02/2012 (25)
        
        BALL FACED LIE. - NM 12:12:27 2/02/2012 (24)
        
        That's BALD not BALL, but you're still right. - nm 18:00:05 2/02/2012 (6)
        
        I thought it was BOLD - like a type face. - nm 06:35:16 2/03/2012 (2)
        
        sm - AD 00:02:49 2/04/2012 (0)
        
        It is bold - nm 06:53:58 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        Ball, bald, bold, balled, whatever, it is still wrong, wrong - wrong, as in not right, incorrect. 23:26:05 2/02/2012 (0)
        
        Yea, a ball face brings a whole different picture to mind. LOL! - nm 20:47:16 2/02/2012 (1)
        
        Must be a real nut-job! LOLOL - nm 10:31:43 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        No, it's not a lie. It's true - they just don't see they are being kept back. - Why do you think they got so pissed off at Bill Cosby? 12:57:30 2/02/2012 (8)
        
        Who got mad at Bill Crosby? - Umm 15:16:55 2/02/2012 (7)
        
        The black community. He suggested they get up and do something about their station in life instead - of spending their time being a victim. 15:21:44 2/02/2012 (6)
        
        Kind of thought that might be the *they* you were speaking of, but then I thought - nah, not on this board. Guess white people don't abuse the system. nm 21:58:32 2/02/2012 (5)
        
        We were TALKING about BILL COSBY and who he annoyed. Don't even try - the racist angle. We all know whites abuse the system too. Good try though. 06:00:23 2/03/2012 (4)
        
        No, it wasn't really that good a try. - nm 06:36:16 2/03/2012 (3)
        
        "Who got made a Bill Cosby" ? I answered that. - Reading comprehension 101 ? 09:47:09 2/03/2012 (2)
        
        Good idea. I meant her race baiting. Read the post I answered. - nm 11:48:07 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        MAD AT - , 09:47:35 2/03/2012 (0)
        
        Why are Dem voters largely blocks of people.. The poor, minorities, etc? - It's all about the promise of giving them something. 12:55:48 2/02/2012 (7)
        
        Exactly correct. - nm 13:01:56 2/02/2012 (6)
        
        Don't forget, there are MANY, MANY rich democrats too. - Stop pretending you know ANYTHING about the democrat party. 13:07:15 2/02/2012 (5)
        
        Yes, the rich ones (like Hollywood) do it to feel morally superior to everybody else. - It's all about them and the persona they want, than concern for the poor. 14:10:48 2/02/2012 (0)
        
        They are portrayed as the good rich people, not the - evil rich Republican people. 13:42:03 2/02/2012 (3)
        
        Like Oprah who spends millions in Africa than helping here at home - in the good ole USA who provided her with the opportunity to make $$$$ sm 14:02:39 2/02/2012 (2)
        
        18 other charities that Oprah supports, many in the US. - sm 14:07:34 2/02/2012 (1)
        
        Heifer International? Sorry, that made me laugh. Was that from her infamous - beef lawsuit? nm 14:18:32 2/02/2012 (0)
  - I don't know who you are but you are fair, and I appreciate that. - nm 17:10:29 2/01/2012 (0)
- He said in the same sentence he is focused on the middle class. Obama claims - to be, but in reality, he only cares about the poor (especially the ones who live off the system). 13:50:02 2/01/2012 (0)
Are YOU READY to be bombed back to the stone ages? Watch this: - Swizzle_Stick 11:37:37 2/01/2012 (16)
- That was powerful. nm - AD 13:42:21 2/01/2012 (9)
  - I dare anyone to find another who rightfully predicted so much. - To call him naive or ignorant or kooky is to actually be all those things. lissa 14:31:40 2/01/2012 (8)
    - He IS ignorant, naive, and kooky. I am NOT. - Stop calling posters names, stick to public figures. NM 23:37:08 2/01/2012 (6)
      - You have no proof that he is any of those things and there appears to be scads - of proof to the contrary. NM 12:18:37 2/02/2012 (0)
      - ^self-centered much? - nm 11:32:53 2/02/2012 (0)
      - Lissa didn't call any poster a name. People really should learn to read and - comprehend before posting. The world doesn't revolve around posters here. 08:19:25 2/02/2012 (3)
        
        Sure she did. People here have said those things about Ron Paul - so she is aiming directly at them with her words, no one else. SM 09:04:23 2/02/2012 (2)
        
        You are saying there is no one else on the face of the earth who feels - that way about Ron Paul? She didn't say posters here. S/M 10:19:01 2/02/2012 (1)
        
        Those are the negative posts made about him lately here. - STOP speaking for her. She knows what she meant. nm 23:51:56 2/02/2012 (0)
    - "Truth is treason in an empire of lies." - Ron Paul sm 15:57:30 2/01/2012 (0)
- I've been saying this since the PA was signed in 2001. - I do not understand why if our ancestors had the balls...sm 12:46:04 2/01/2012 (0)
- Re: Are YOU READY to be bombed back to the stone ages? Watch this: - lissa 11:55:40 2/01/2012 (4)
  - Dont know what happened to my subject line, but S_S, this is for you. - lissa 11:56:30 2/01/2012 (3)
    - Thank you Lissa. sm - Swizzle_Stick 20:42:35 2/01/2012 (2)
      - awww kiddo, I am right there with you. - lissa 11:09:42 2/02/2012 (1)
        
        and here is something I read this morning to carry me through the day as a supporter sm - lissa 11:21:01 2/02/2012 (0)
American Airlines to cut 15,000 jobs and NYC on a hiring spree - - to hire welfare workers. 09:57:55 2/01/2012 (4)
- We have way too many planes in the air..we need to cut in half at - the very least. 12:44:10 2/01/2012 (3)
  - We have way too many planes in the air???? - nm 14:23:44 2/01/2012 (2)
    - Apparently this person hasn't flown lately. Flew NY to LA twice this year. We were - packed in like friggin cattle. It was awful. 15:54:05 2/01/2012 (1)
      - yep, on four recent flights, two were 100%, the other two about 90% full. - billybob 18:19:59 2/01/2012 (0)
SC hired high-priced lawyer to defend voter ID law. sm - AD 09:41:36 2/01/2012 (29)
- And just wait until the unemployed have to be drug tested. - sm 06:37:49 2/02/2012 (1)
  - I am against drug testing those unemployed, but I am for sm - AD 10:04:11 2/02/2012 (0)
- "Illegal Voter Suppression Law" speaks to me of suppression of - illegal voters. Sounds like a good law to me. 14:44:57 2/01/2012 (0)
- Biased much? - nm 10:43:58 2/01/2012 (25)
  - Oh, well, then I agree. Haley is definitely biased against those - who might have trouble getting ID and biased against those who sm AD 13:31:09 2/01/2012 (22)
    - Might is a weasel. This man throws around the words illegal and - unconstitutional like they've already been adjudicated. Progressive claptrap. 14:54:13 2/01/2012 (21)
      - Those who HAVE trouble. There you go. nm - AD 15:09:37 2/01/2012 (20)
        
        You can cross off students because they all have ID. Some states are - providing them free so what is their problem? Progressive claptrap. 18:27:15 2/01/2012 (19)
        
        If people are provided with ID free, I have no problem. nm - AD 19:26:59 2/01/2012 (18)
        
        That doesn't surprise me. Anything that's free. Everyone else has to - pay for their own, but if you're supposedly a minority you get it free. 20:16:48 2/01/2012 (17)
        
        No, I mean give it to everyone. nm - AD 20:47:16 2/01/2012 (16)
        
        Most people already have ID that they've paid for like driver's license, - state ID cards, or whatever they use to buy booze and cigarettes. S/M 08:28:40 2/02/2012 (15)
        
        As you said, "most" do. Not all. And it is a farce, but sm - AD 10:06:11 2/02/2012 (14)
        
        So you're admitting the free IDs will go to Democrats. - nm 10:13:22 2/02/2012 (13)
        
        The poor and minorities generally do VOTE Democrat, sm - AD 10:37:57 2/02/2012 (12)
        
        A constitutional right only if you are a qualified citizen. What do you see - as standing in the way of anyone getting a picture ID card? 11:39:12 2/02/2012 (11)
        
        Money for one. Inability to get out and about with ease. sm - AD 13:38:15 2/02/2012 (10)
        
        With ease? Are you serious? Free everything and now they don't - even have to use some effort? How do they get to the voting booths? 18:05:15 2/02/2012 (2)
        
        I had an aunt who worked at the polls for 30 years (est). She sm - AD 18:42:00 2/02/2012 (1)
        
        You may need it in the future. - nm 19:13:18 2/02/2012 (0)
        
        If there is public transportationavailable why can't they use that to go get - their picture ID? If they are truly poor then they are S/M 16:15:34 2/02/2012 (6)
        
        sm - AD 23:58:46 2/02/2012 (4)
        
        I mentioned booze and cigarettes because you mentioned being poor was a consideration. - If physical disabilities keep them from getting ID then it S/M 11:53:07 2/03/2012 (3)
        
        You mentioned it more than once. People can vote sm - AD 13:43:32 2/03/2012 (2)
        
        How do they get groceries, go to the doctor, or church? They only need to - go once to get a picture ID. I do have a vested interest in S/M 13:57:32 2/03/2012 (1)
        
        Fear not! I would never say that. sm - AD 00:07:23 2/04/2012 (0)
        
        I'll answer later. nm - AD 18:43:02 2/02/2012 (0)
  - I posted an article. What makes me biased? Then surely everyone sm - AD 10:54:05 2/01/2012 (1)
    - Did I mention you? No. - nm 12:40:58 2/01/2012 (0)
Susan G. Koman Foundation has new policy of - not giving money to organizations under investigation. 09:19:58 2/01/2012 (1)
- Good - nm 09:28:56 2/01/2012 (0)
An amoral herd of left-wing journalists acting like "bootlicking propagandists," - SM 08:58:22 2/01/2012 (5)
- This is the most disingenuous fake outrage crap I have seen in a - long time. 12:43:21 2/01/2012 (2)
  - Actually, ^this POST is the most disingenuous fake outrage crap I have seen - nm 14:07:50 2/01/2012 (0)
  - Then you are not very well informed of the facts, which, - as the article is pointing out, is exactly the goal of left-wing "journalists." 12:50:28 2/01/2012 (0)
- Absolutely. They are willing accomplices - of this corrupt administration in the coverup of this crime. NM 10:29:31 2/01/2012 (1)
  - ~~crickets burping~~ and ~~cows thudpuckering~~ - nm 11:18:16 2/01/2012 (0)
CBO says real unemployment rate is 10%. - Another WH lie. 15:46:55 1/31/2012 (4)
- Nope. That's a congressional lie. CBO is a congressional entity not - a WH entity. Regardless, the real unemployment rate is closer to 24%. 18:51:56 1/31/2012 (3)
  - :::WHIZZZZ:::: - SM 08:30:39 2/01/2012 (0)
  - The CBO is considered pretty fair, impartial, and independent. (nm) - Their figures are regularly relied on by both parties without complaint. 19:01:26 1/31/2012 (1)
    - Unfortunately they only can work with the figures given them. If they are incorrect - from the WH then so are the conclusions of the CBO 21:05:29 1/31/2012 (0)
Christie calls some democrats - numb nuts - love this guy. 11:00:24 1/31/2012 (3)
- better than terrorists which the highest officials in the admin are calling repubs - nm 11:30:24 1/31/2012 (2)
  - but...but...but...they LOVE terrorists so why are they calling Repubs that name? - nm 08:45:32 2/01/2012 (0)
  - Yep--more of a threat than N. Korea or Pakistan or Iran. - They're very, very angry and dysfunctional. nm 11:37:39 1/31/2012 (0)
Ron Paul often wonders - sm 10:43:15 1/31/2012 (80)
- Ramp it up. Never fear, 100,000 troops to be in the region by March. sm - I suppose we can begin a real war with Iran soon thereafter. lissa 11:05:20 1/31/2012 (79)
  - The BIGGER question should be why does Ron Paul NOT fear Iran - and its nuclear power. He's naive. Living in a cave. nm 08:33:35 2/01/2012 (0)
  - you just don't get it Lissa. - I doubt you even took 10 seconds to read the entire context. nm 11:24:08 1/31/2012 (77)
    - Believe me, I get it and, yes, I read the article sm - lissa 11:38:05 1/31/2012 (75)
      - You think we'll be able to survive WITHOUT being ready to fight - Russia and China. This is all about survival of the fittest tribes, hon. nm 08:34:39 2/01/2012 (0)
      - Are you ready for this scenario to occur? - sm 11:45:15 1/31/2012 (37)
        
        I guess it all depends on which experts you believe. sm - lissa 11:59:33 1/31/2012 (36)
        
        And that brings us to the crux of the problem... WHICH way will it go? - You're fine with waiting and finding out? 12:10:30 1/31/2012 (35)
        
        Of course. Ron Paul and his followers are basically wishful thinkers. - Pie in the sky utopia and all that. nm 08:35:41 2/01/2012 (6)
        
        Unlike the guy who wants to put a colony on the moon. - nm 09:18:04 2/01/2012 (5)
        
        I could NOT care less about that guy and he's not the subject of the thread. - Deflect much? nm 14:03:09 2/01/2012 (3)
        
        It's called contrast and compare and is an often used debate technique. - nm 14:22:02 2/01/2012 (2)
        
        DEFLECTION will lose you points in a debate, my dear. - You're not comparing and contrasting anything. You're deflecting. 20:19:33 2/01/2012 (0)
        
        ...and writing a good paper for a lit course (as well as timelessness - and universality, of course!) lol nm 15:56:14 2/01/2012 (0)
        
        LOL. nm - AD 09:22:05 2/01/2012 (0)
        
        Yes I am. Watchful waiting. What is your alternative? - lissa 12:14:13 1/31/2012 (27)
        
        Hey I know! Lets just sit back, twiddle our thumbs, watch millions of - people vaporize, and while cancer is killing the next million we'll get up and do something. 12:20:22 1/31/2012 (26)
        
        In the meantime, our volunteer military is being "vaporized" by the thousands. - When does that stop? Are you less afraid today than you were 10 years ago? sm 15:00:23 1/31/2012 (12)
        
        Not minimizing ANY loss of life, but more Americans were lost on D-Day alone than - in the last 10 yrs. Just some perspective. 17:36:05 1/31/2012 (10)
        
        If you want perspective, over 400,000 American soldiers died in WW2. - War is a fact of life. IThat 08:42:20 2/01/2012 (1)
        
        (cont'd) That being said, we need to address the religious and tribal - smg Hit return by mistake 08:44:31 2/01/2012 (0)
        
        While D-Day was tragic in its scope, I do not see that your claim is true. sm - AD 00:29:43 2/01/2012 (7)
        
        You're basically arguing a stupid argument. That was ONE day. - The entire war took over 400,000 American soldiers' lives. sm 08:46:48 2/01/2012 (4)
        
        You misunderstand. I simply asked a poster to back up a claim. sm - AD 08:53:12 2/01/2012 (3)
        
        I haven't misunderstood a thing. You're arguing for the sake of argument - nm 08:59:30 2/01/2012 (2)
        
        Mitt Romney has promised to move the WH to Utah. sm - AD 09:09:39 2/01/2012 (1)
        
        ::;fizzle::: - :::yawn::: 14:08:46 2/01/2012 (0)
        
        Okay, so say it's 3400, how about this statistic? In April and May 1944, the Allied air forces - lost nearly 12,000 men. NM 06:53:23 2/01/2012 (1)
        
        I just addressed the veracity of your claim. nm - AD 08:39:02 2/01/2012 (0)
        
        Look at these numbers from my post below. sm - lissa 15:09:53 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        What is your alternative? - lissa 12:20:57 1/31/2012 (12)
        
        Get rid of their nuclear capabilities. Last thing we need is another unstable Islamic - country that verbally threatens having a nuclear bomb. 12:28:35 1/31/2012 (11)
        
        How do you plan on getting rid of their nuclear capabilities? - lissa 12:32:39 1/31/2012 (10)
        
        I'll leave that up to the experts. - . 14:40:37 1/31/2012 (9)
        
        The only "experts" are soldiers' dead bodies. - nm 15:01:41 1/31/2012 (8)
        
        Are you by chance a former hippie? You remind me of my old hippie brother. - nm 19:05:04 1/31/2012 (7)
        
        No, I am a conservative who is against this war. My father, my husband, my cousins - were in the armed services. My child and my nephew currently are. nm 13:22:12 2/01/2012 (0)
        
        Does your brother know how many times you bring him up on this board? LOL - AD 00:30:52 2/01/2012 (5)
        
        LOL so true. - nm 11:16:17 2/01/2012 (0)
        
        Oh, you meal all 2 times? LOL - yourself. 06:54:05 2/01/2012 (3)
        
        Puleeze. I've seen you reference him at least 4x myself. - nm 08:37:46 2/01/2012 (2)
        
        Considering we're all middle aged, I'm sure more than 1 or 2 have older - brothers who were hippies. Sheesh. 15:56:18 2/01/2012 (1)
        
        Puleeze. - nm 20:20:07 2/01/2012 (0)
      - Lissa, because I agree of the danger that Iran poses, does not - sm 11:42:23 1/31/2012 (35)
        
        Sure. sm - lissa 11:48:18 1/31/2012 (34)
        
        You don't believe even for a minute. You're really that convinced? - That's pretty amazing since in essence, you call every sm 12:17:05 1/31/2012 (2)
        
        I didn't call anyone a liar. There are experts on both sides. - I am perfectly capable of forming an opinion. lissa 12:20:32 1/31/2012 (1)
        
        military experts on both sides? military experts who argue that - Iran wouldn't use them?? ROFLMA 12:49:40 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        Straight out of Ron Paul's mouth, word for word.. - Incredible. 12:15:05 1/31/2012 (1)
        
        I could say the same about some here. Straight out of Newt Romney's (Obama's) mouth. - lissa 12:23:37 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        Their govt is not like ours. It will not be sorted out on elections. - You think the Ayatollah is just going to give up power? nm 12:14:06 1/31/2012 (28)
        
        elections, revolution, evolution-let the Iranian people sort it out. - lissa 12:21:52 1/31/2012 (27)
        
        A revolution would be great. In the meantime, while we wait, - you aren't worried about millions being vaporized. 12:50:47 1/31/2012 (17)
        
        My last worry in the world is being vaporized by an Iranian nuclear bomb. sm - lissa 12:57:35 1/31/2012 (16)
        
        Well Lissa, for your information, Abdul Qudeer Khan - (Pakistans nuclear guy) gave info about nukes to Iran. Friends. Oh ya, don't doubt it. 13:11:38 1/31/2012 (1)
        
        Pakistan would cheer if Iran could vaporize Israel - nm 13:14:07 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        No problem then in your thinking when Iran succeeds in - Global Jihad? 13:07:35 1/31/2012 (12)
        
        She truly believes, like The Soviet Union, that they wouldn't do it. BIG difference - in thinking between those two cultures. NM 13:09:35 1/31/2012 (6)
        
        Did I once mention the Soviet Union? I said I don't believe Iran is a threat based on info we have - and the arguments from some experts. lissa 13:35:04 1/31/2012 (5)
        
        And just because there are no registered sex offenders in your neighborhood it doesn't - mean there are no perverts living there. Imagine how we DON'T know about Iran. 13:44:22 1/31/2012 (4)
        
        How do we alleviate that fear? sm - lissa 13:49:26 1/31/2012 (3)
        
        Your plan would be feasible if it were 1537 and it took 3 months for a ship to get here in order - to do anything to us. Pulled up the drawbridge and filling the moat doesn't work anymore. 14:42:42 1/31/2012 (2)
        
        Neither does pre-emptive war - lissa 14:50:46 1/31/2012 (1)
        
        Lots of "pre-emptive" things work. Waiting until something festers out of - control is what doesn't work in the end. 17:37:28 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        Who in the hell ever said that Iran's goal is global jihad? - lissa 13:09:16 1/31/2012 (4)
        
        You don't think Iran would love to start a global jihad? - ? The want to be the RULER of such. 13:13:03 1/31/2012 (3)
        
        Where is evidence of such? - lissa 13:30:27 1/31/2012 (2)
        
        surely you aren't serious. Iran has been supplying weapons - to all the terrorists out there. Please do read up on this. 14:43:02 1/31/2012 (1)
        
        Says who? besides the CFR and Israel? - lissa 14:50:18 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        So we need another country with that situation? NO. - . 13:06:52 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        You do realize they are a huge exporter of weapons of terrorism. What if one ends - up in a mall where you or your loved ones are? 12:30:06 1/31/2012 (8)
        
        The odds that I will be hit by lightening are higher. Sorry. I just don't feed into the fear. - lissa 12:33:41 1/31/2012 (7)
        
        Well sure, it is easy to ignore the danger to others, just as long as you don't have to personally - worry, why care.. Right? 12:38:50 1/31/2012 (6)
        
        you specifically asked about me and my loved ones. - lissa 12:45:04 1/31/2012 (5)
        
        Well, my loved ones are no more important than anyone else's, therefore - I do care about dangers to others that may not involve me. 13:08:28 1/31/2012 (1)
        
        We all live with the same odds. sm - lissa 13:44:51 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        Agree. nm - AD 13:08:28 1/31/2012 (1)
        
        Sorry for the essentially double post. LOL. I answered sm - AD 13:09:30 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        I'm with you on this one, lissa. nm - AD 13:04:50 1/31/2012 (0)
    - Ron Paul thinks it is okay for Iran to get a nuclear bomb, as if they - would never use it. He puts them in the same category as Russia. How foolish. nm 11:25:58 1/31/2012 (0)
They can increase Medicaid and pay for abortions. - What about us? - Granny - (sm) 08:12:13 1/31/2012 (22)
- Paying for abortions will leave more money for everyone later on. (NM) - That safe, legal procedure is a LOT less expensive than creating more unwanted children. 19:03:23 1/31/2012 (4)
  - Gee, I thought the *creation* of them was free. - nm 21:07:27 1/31/2012 (0)
  - Well, it's a lot cheaper to get rid of sick babies/kids and old people who don't contribute - to society any longer, but we don't go offing them, do we? 19:07:49 1/31/2012 (2)
    - We don't have euthanasia yet in most states, so you're on the slippery slope all by yourself. (nm) - But abortion is still safe, legal, and also economical. It's a three-way winner. 17:57:31 2/01/2012 (1)
      - It isn't always safe and to say so is inaccurate. - nm 20:18:33 2/01/2012 (0)
- Frankly, the law should mandate that docs cannot refuse Medicare patients. - nm 10:04:51 1/31/2012 (3)
  - What would be their incentive to stay in business with less reimbursement? - Phyllis 11:21:14 1/31/2012 (2)
    - Honestly, people think medicine should be a hobby for doctors. Spend 150K on college - and work for peanuts. Not gonna happen. 11:24:32 1/31/2012 (1)
      - And the grand irony of it all is MTs whining and complaining about - their wages going down the toilet. sm 14:55:19 1/31/2012 (0)
- I did read the link quickly. The one question I have is this: sm - nm 08:41:22 1/31/2012 (11)
  - I don't know about that. I can only assume (?) that there are many (sm) - G 08:52:33 1/31/2012 (10)
    - Another problem is that a doctor can't pick and choose his Medicare (sm) - Phyllis 09:05:20 1/31/2012 (9)
      - And would they take abortion patients (federally funded) and not Medicare patients? - nm 11:02:46 1/31/2012 (7)
        
        Most doctors don't do abortions so it wouldn't affect them. - Phyllis 11:28:45 1/31/2012 (6)
        
        I'm talking about the abortion clinics that do. Surely they have doctors that -sm - nm 12:11:46 1/31/2012 (5)
        
        It is my understanding that abortion clinics aren't "allowed" to spend (sm) - Phyllis 12:22:16 1/31/2012 (4)
        
        Finally! I actually see it in writing on this board. No federal money - for abortions. Has hell frozen over? nm 15:18:23 1/31/2012 (3)
        
        However, there is an investigation into Planned Parenthood for that very offense. - Phyllis 12:43:02 2/01/2012 (0)
        
        The funds used for abortions are offset by federal funds. If there were no (sm) - Phyllis 16:11:24 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        Do you not understand what the quotation marks mean? - nm 15:48:04 1/31/2012 (0)
      - Never even thought about that. Ugh. - nm 09:14:34 1/31/2012 (0)
- Doncha know? If you're old and useless and non-productive, you don't matter that much. - But a young woman with an unwanted pregnancy is so much more important. (sarcasm) 08:25:50 1/31/2012 (0)
This is such an angry board! Life is to short to be angry - all the time. I'm outa here. sm 06:22:16 1/31/2012 (27)
- I do understand what you mean. I feel very fortunate that at least - sm - Dixiedew 08:45:39 1/31/2012 (25)
  - If anyone is the "hit bitch" it is you. Let's just look at the insults - you hurled inside this post. nm 09:50:46 1/31/2012 (3)
    - So what? She insulted people who hate Obama and Glenn Beck followers. - No one here specifically, unlike the way she is trolled with every post. NM 09:57:01 1/31/2012 (2)
      - Answering someone's posts with a reply isn't trolling, hon. - That's the stupidest thing I've seen here today SM 14:06:30 2/01/2012 (0)
      - Just because she says controversial things that elicit - controversial responses doesn't mean she's being *TROLLED*. smh. nm 22:15:37 1/31/2012 (0)
  - I can't worship Glenn Beck as much as I used to because he's not on (sm) - Granny 08:59:54 1/31/2012 (19)
    - If that means I have to watch Fox News, no thanks. - I have all kinds of news outlets, but I do try to avoid anything Tea Party oriented. Dixiedew 11:06:31 1/31/2012 (18)
      - I guess you prefer the occupiers? who threw condoms at - Catholic school girls? Obama's WH refuses to condemn. Wanna see a link? (sm) 14:16:52 1/31/2012 (8)
        
        Absolutely no. Why should I be for that? Your psychic - powers are diminished. Dixiedew 15:20:03 1/31/2012 (7)
        
        Psychic powers? WTH are you talking about? - nm 17:04:10 1/31/2012 (5)
        
        The "psychic powers" come into play when you try to think you - *know* anything about what I Dixiedew 18:55:16 1/31/2012 (4)
        
        To finish my post...what I am for or against. You just - think you know everything, but you don't know Jack Schitt about me what I support. Dixiedew 18:57:27 1/31/2012 (3)
        
        *I* know Jack Schitt. He's a friend of mine. - nm 20:21:50 2/01/2012 (0)
        
        Wasn't John Edwards one? - nm 21:09:02 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        You spell it out for us every time you come here. - We're not stupid. 21:08:12 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        Because Obama thinks they are just doing their civic duty - - and that the Tea Partiers were terrorist. He's a stupid man. 15:29:57 1/31/2012 (0)
      - Do you even know what the Tea Party represents? or who? - Granny 11:08:38 1/31/2012 (7)
        
        Yes. It represents people who are totally dissatisfied with America - sm - Dixiedew 12:20:06 1/31/2012 (6)
        
        YOU don't want a balanced budget? You just want to spend, spend spend? - BTW, how come the dems never passed a budget when they held the reins. nm 00:53:47 2/02/2012 (0)
        
        And what does TEA stand for? TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY!! - nm 13:57:59 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        I think I saw that little old lady, the militant in the ground. Oh, wait, that was the FLOTUS - LOL 12:29:02 1/31/2012 (1)
        
        I meant in the crowd. LOL - Freud strikes again. 12:30:31 1/31/2012 (0)
        
        It's pointless. - nm 12:27:41 1/31/2012 (1)
        
        I know. - nm 13:16:58 1/31/2012 (0)
      - And as an aside, Lissa's news is always wrong. ADs new is always wrong. - So are other democrats. And I know we don't all watch/read/hear the same sites. Dixiedew 11:08:23 1/31/2012 (0)
  - Despise, not despite. - Dixiedew 08:46:54 1/31/2012 (0)
- It's the stupidity. - nm 07:16:48 1/31/2012 (0)
I don't necessarily agree with all written, this does report quite well how DC works. sm - lissa 18:40:04 1/30/2012 (2)
- would it "level the playing field" if judges were allowed SM - billybob 20:57:15 1/30/2012 (1)
  - If they agreed to make the law to work one way, then yes. sm - lissa 21:16:46 1/30/2012 (0)
Why do so many supposed medical transcriptionists - seemingly not know that its (possessive) doesn't have an apostrophe? (sm) 15:59:30 1/30/2012 (14)
- Superiority complex? They dont' transcribe for you so why do you care? - nm 14:15:20 1/31/2012 (1)
  - They dont' ?? LOL - nm 15:07:32 1/31/2012 (0)
- We DO know, but we get so busy typing, it's just a brain fart on our part - nm 19:56:11 1/30/2012 (3)
  - Does that mean when you're trying to make money transcribing and are in a hurry - you get brain farts also. One would assume. 05:35:11 1/31/2012 (2)
    - I never sacrifice quantity for quality. I proof everything for MR. - Doesn't EVERYONE? nm 09:51:38 1/31/2012 (1)
      - Evidently not. - nm 15:30:50 1/31/2012 (0)
- IT'S an easy mistake to make since most possessives use an apostrophe. - No one here gets paid for their lines. NM 17:24:30 1/30/2012 (3)
  - Seems to me it should be easy to remember for that very reason. - All other possessives have an apostrophe. This is the only one that does not. 17:32:28 1/30/2012 (2)
    - Are you talking about HERE or in medical records you're reading? - If it's here, the spelling/grammar police do not EXIST so SM 19:57:06 1/30/2012 (0)
    - Is it the only one? I did not know that. - nm 17:48:43 1/30/2012 (0)
- Well, well Little Miss Perfect, I guess you never made at typo in - your life. nm 16:46:55 1/30/2012 (3)
  - Not talking about typos. I'm talking about not knowing. - Not perfect OP. 17:31:24 1/30/2012 (2)
    - You seem to be the same person who always thinks things should be your way? - nm 21:00:02 1/30/2012 (0)
    - The main consensus here seems to be no one cares. - That says a lot. 20:15:58 1/30/2012 (0)
Stuff it. - nm 15:05:34 1/30/2012 (0)
Moochie closes down store, just like Oprah - spends $50,000 - on lingerie - WH denies. Of course they do! 12:01:39 1/30/2012 (35)
- When were Michelle and the Queen of Qatar in NY together? - Why no articles about them hanging out together last year? NM 14:16:59 1/30/2012 (0)
- Daily Mail is a gossip rag. I prefer to read news, not gossip. - nm 13:13:55 1/30/2012 (0)
- Envious? - nm 13:12:04 1/30/2012 (9)
  - Not a bit. I pay for my own underwear, thanks. - nm 13:19:07 1/30/2012 (8)
    - And how do you know she didn't? First of all, I think if she - sm - Dixiedew 08:50:53 1/31/2012 (7)
      - Wouldn't they deliver to the FLOTUS? LOL - nm 12:06:36 1/31/2012 (6)
        
        Maybe, maybe not. There would still be a paper trail. - nm 16:36:53 1/31/2012 (5)
        
        LOLOL - A PAPER TRAIL??? In THIS administration? - HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 17:16:49 1/31/2012 (4)
        
        You know, I have to laugh when people act like you are acting. sm - Dixiedew 19:03:27 1/31/2012 (3)
        
        Since you know Barack so well, do you have any idea why he won't - let us see his college grades or theses? Please share. 21:11:08 1/31/2012 (2)
        
        Okay, I will. Here is my answer. Because in the grand scheme of things, my dear, - sm - Dixiedew 05:22:53 2/01/2012 (1)
        
        If he were a Tea Partier or a Republican, my dear, he would have already - had to show them. He would have been vetted, unlike Mr. Popularity (sm) 06:56:34 2/01/2012 (0)
- SHE didn't close it down. Blame the US Secret Service. - nm Catwoman 12:55:48 1/30/2012 (1)
  - Of course she closed it down. You think her SS bodyguards are going to shut - it down if she isn't there? 13:00:11 1/30/2012 (0)
- :::yawn::: Stop calling her Moochie. You're doing our party no favors. nm - right-wing conservative. 12:49:20 1/30/2012 (4)
  - Our party is in such shape that it wouldn't matter if I called her Michelle. - I prefer Mooch 12:53:32 1/30/2012 (3)
    - Regardless of what you call her, she is who she is and there is not a - thing you can do about it. nm 05:44:44 1/31/2012 (2)
      - Reeeeelllly?? - nm 07:34:25 1/31/2012 (1)
        
        Absolutely. Even if you vote her husband out of office, she will - still be Michelle Obama. You can't change that. nm 08:52:11 1/31/2012 (0)
- Wait, not just a store - the whole of Madison Avenue. - nm 12:28:24 1/30/2012 (0)
- That's just silly but so what if she did? She is free to spend her money as she pleases. - Wealth envy is so ugly. NM 12:14:33 1/30/2012 (14)
  - I wasn't aware that she worked. Is the First Lady paid a salary? - Just asking because I don't know. nm 14:28:06 1/30/2012 (7)
    - She had a huge salary before she was FLOTUS. Do you think - she spent every penny of it? sm 19:59:04 1/30/2012 (1)
      - no - nm 20:40:35 1/30/2012 (0)
    - No. - nm 17:01:43 1/30/2012 (0)
    - The Obamas made $5.5M in 2009, $1.7M in 2010. - I bet she has a savings account. nm 14:39:47 1/30/2012 (3)
      - For doing what exactly? - I know the POTUS doesn't make that much. Does the TOTUS? 15:56:38 1/30/2012 (1)
        
        Book sales. President's salary is $400,000/year plus about $170,000 for expenses. - nm 16:44:00 1/30/2012 (0)
      - Did they pay their "fair share" in taxes? - (sorry, I couldn't resist) nm 14:41:26 1/30/2012 (0)
  - HER MONEY? - nm 13:52:21 1/30/2012 (3)
    - She was making more than he was when they met. (nm) - She was the big deal, he was the newbie novice. 20:04:04 1/30/2012 (0)
    - I'm wondering how she got to NY. Private plane? - nm 14:03:49 1/30/2012 (1)
      - No way. Airport 1 probably. he lies about everything else. - nm 15:53:55 1/30/2012 (0)
  - Reportedly it is where RuPaul buys his/her lingerie. - Slutty? Not familiar with the place. 12:21:03 1/30/2012 (1)
    - Looking at the website, much of it is very very pretty. Some provocative. - Some cutting edge fashion. I would shop there if I had the $$ and the body to wear it. NM 12:28:28 1/30/2012 (0)
Post A Message
Forum hosted by Site Gadgets

NotSoPolituvus

Post A Message